pantantrollo

Members
  • Content count

    485
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

156 Excellent

About pantantrollo

  • Rank
    Junior Mage

Profile Information

  • Gender Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

5,449 profile views
  1. It is supposed to be fixed also in the 5.3.x series, let's hope ...
  2. You have also retouched the issue of web certificates ssl, now YES at least appears the SSL certificate information on the web, although if you could have left another color when the certificate is correct, and not leave it in red (confusing)
  3. Hi brother,
    I have read all your lines about the security of maxthon. And I would like you to recommend me which version of maxthon is similar, with the same features even "resource sniffer"?? In your experience, please!

    ?

    ?

    ?

    1. pantantrollo

      pantantrollo

      Good,

      (first of all, I'm not an expert on anything, just a normal user :))

      Well I would not know what is the most recommended version in terms of security, basically because Maxthon is a little used browser and therefore little audited by the real experts (not so with opera and vivaldi that is their communities of people there are more movement)

      To be honest, !! We are sold !! :), that's why you would almost like to use one version than another. I usually use the last stable of the series 5.

      But the versions that I liked the most, are the last stable of the series 4. 4.4.x and 4.9.x. They seemed lighter, more configurable. But of course, now they have very old nuclei (although the 5.2.x series, it has a 61.x blink core and it is sure that it has enough security holes at the moment.

      In the end, without knowing code or deep security issues, everything falls on the implementation that is made in the browsers of the core blink (chromiun) is as current as possible (vivaldi, opera, MSEdge etc), if not, is to be played as with any outdated software.

      sorry?for?me English (googletized)

      ?

  4. Honestly, I'm not surprised at all. Maxthon is an expired project, you just have to see the implementations of the core and the delay they have in front of the competition. We have to think about real alternatives, with large communities and large support teams. Here the users ONLY have bugsir006 as a connection with the developers and nothing else (at these time I have not seen anyone else) In other communities that we already know, even the DEV itself answers in the forums and the blog. I think it's best to let him die in peace
  5. Parallel Beta Versions?

    Maxthon is built with blink core (chromiun) The current branch 5.2.7.x has 61.x and the 5.3.8.x has 69.x
  6. Bug multiple folders in maxnote (favorites)

    I understand, as in any file system, to be able to create folders with the same name, it is obvious, but having a folder with the same name, INSIDE the same branch of the tree, is not only not logical, it is not functional. In the example of the image above, where everything hangs from the same branch, how do you know where the tests I am looking for are? Looking at all the test_1 folders one by one? File trees prevent this type of case, precisely because it would be chaos to have many folders with the same name within the same branch, not only for the user, but for the system itself.
  7. your default browser is at risk maxthon

    It's more windows problem, especially windows 10. https://support.microsoft.com/es-es/help/4028606/windows-10-change-your-default-browser
  8. Web page sign in issues

    Of course not. Just be aware of what faults you could assume. I, for example, continue with the .2000, well, actually, with the .2100, which behaves almost the same, at least in the way I work. I test betas, if I see that I can work with them and there are no functionalities that bother me, I continue with them, at least until something fails, and I go back in version.
  9. Web page sign in issues

    5.2.7.2300 is a beta version
  10. Right, there are also your passwords saved
  11. maxthon support needed

    It may also be a problem attributable to IDM and its integration. Try to see if the same thing happens with any of the portable versions of the series 5.3.8.xxx, which have a more modern chrome core.
  12. Problem (Solved)

    That's okay As I said in general it works, but sometimes it fails. You just have to hit the cross to close the banner, possibly next time it will not come out :-)
  13. The matter is quite serious. In addition, and already commented here in the past, all those URLs are sent to the maxthon servers (without knowing exactly what they do with them), If we have checked the box "Enable secure URL scan.This helps protect the browser and local machine against unsafe websites ", that basically we have to have it activated, because if not, we can not see the ssl certificates of the web that we visited, with what we are almost" forced "to have it activated. I already asked in a comment that this be separated, but there is no way they want or understand this. I repeat, @BugSir006, why to see the ssl certificates that any other browser offers me, I have to Yes or YES, activate this option in maxthon about the sending of URLs in the options?